A systematic review to evaluate the effectiveness of enzyme replacement therapy for lysosomal storage disorders in comparison to the treatment of similar diseases with higher prevalence

Shona Helen Lang, Nigel Armstrong, Caro Noakes, Jos Kleijnen

Abstract


Significant challenges exist when submitting orphan drugs for reimbursement in a health care system. An assessment of value for money is undertaken by comparing the costs and clinical effectiveness of the new technology to that of an existing treatment. Orphan drugs rarely have standard treatments, with which to contrast a new technology. We aimed to compare the clinical effectiveness of enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) for rare diseases, to that of recommended drugs for comparable but non-rare diseases (lifelong treatment, shortened life expectancy due to the disease), using number needed to benefit (NNTB).

A systematic review was performed to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of ERT treatments in three rare diseases; Fabry Disease, Hunter Syndrome (MPS II) and Gaucher Disease Type 1. MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process Citations and Daily Update, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, Health Technology Assessment Database, ClinicalTrials.gov, metaRegister of Controlled Trials and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform were searched from inception to August 2012. We identified comparator studies from the NICE (UK) or IQWiG/G-BA (Germany), websites to 2012. For each study, NNTB analyses were performed for the primary outcome of all (recommended) drug doses, at all follow-up times.

Ten ERT RCTs were identified (8 in Fabry Disease, 2 in Hunter Syndrome, 0 in Gaucher Disease). Eleven analyses were performed for ERTs; NNTB calculated from the mean absolute risk difference ranged from 1.4 to 17.2 (median = 2.7). Seven comparator disease studies were identified in multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, type 2 diabetes mellitus, peripheral arterial disease and Alzheimer disease. Thirty-nine analyses were performed for the comparator studies; NNTB ranged from -61.8 to 330.8 (median = 4.6).

The median value of NNTB values was lower for ERT studies than for comparator studies, suggesting that ERT therapies for rare diseases were more effective than existing recommended drugs for comparable diseases. Caution should be applied to the interpretation of these results because the analyses were limited by risk of bias, study size and the lack of identical outcomes. Comparing the effectiveness of orphan drugs with non-orphan drugs using NNTB may provide additional clinical effectiveness information for reimbursement decision making.


Keywords


enzyme replacement therapy, lysosomal storage disorders, rare diseases, effectiveness

Full Text:

PDF

References


Platt FM, Boland B, van der Spoel AC: Lysosomal storage disorders: The cellular impact of lysosomal dysfunction. The Journal of Cell Biology 2012,199:723-734.

Lachmann RH: Enzyme replacement therapy for lysosomal storage diseases. Curr Opin Pediatr 2011,23:588-593 10.1097/MOP.0b013e32834c20d9.

National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) (2009): OGT 918-006: a phase I/I randomized, controlled study of OGT 918 in patients with neuronopathic Gaucher Disease. NIH Clinicaltrials.gov. http://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT00041535

El Dib RP, Pastores GM Enzyme replacement therapy for Anderson-Fabry Disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 5. Art. No: CD006663. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006663.pub2. http://www.mrw.interscience.wiley.com/cochrane/clsysrev/articles/CD006663/frame.html

Meikle PJ, Hopwood JJ, Clague AE, Carey WF: Prevalence of lysosomal storage disorders. JAMA 1999,281:249-254.

Martin R, Beck M, Eng C, Giugliani R, Harmatz P, Muñoz V, et al.: Recognition and Diagnosis of Mucopolysaccharidosis II (Hunter Syndrome). Pediatrics 2008,121:e377-e386.

Connock M, Burls A, Frew E, Fry-Smith A, Juarez-Garcia A, McCabe C, et al.: The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of enzyme replacement therapy for Gaucher's Disease: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess 2006,10:1-152.

European Commission: Public health [Internet] [http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/health_consumer/about_us/contact_en.htm]

Miyamoto BE, Kakkis ED: The potential investment impact of improved access to accelerated approval on the development of treatments for low prevalence rare diseases. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2011,6:49.

Sampson M, McGowan J, Cogo E, Grimshaw J, Moher D, Lefebvre C: An evidence-based practice guideline for the peer review of electronic search strategies. J Clin Epidemiol 2009,62:944-52.

Royle P, Waugh N: Should systematic reviews include searches for published errata? Health Info Libr J 2004,21:14-20.

Wright K, McDaid C: Is the retraction of journal articles in electronic journals and databases consistent and timely? A case study [Poster]. Paper presented at Cochrane Colloquium; 19-22 October 2011; Madrid. In Cochrane Collaboration, 2011.

Wright K, McDaid C: Reporting of article retractions in bibliographic databases and online journals. J Med Libr Assoc 2011,99:164-7.

Higgins JPT, Green S, eds: Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions [Internet]. Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]: The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011 [accessed 23.03.11]. Available from: http://www.cochrane-handbook.org/

Shea BJ, Grimshaw JM, Wells GA, Boers M, Andersson N, Hamel C, et al.: Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 2007,7:10.

Schiffmann R, Kopp JB, Austin IHA, Sabnis S, Moore DF, Weibel T, et al.: Enzyme replacement therapy in Fabry Disease a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2001,285:2743-9.

Eng CM, Guffon N, Wilcox WR, Germain DP, Lee P, Waldek S, et al.: Safety and efficacy of recombinant human alpha-galactosidase a replacement therapy in Fabry's Disease. N Engl J Med 2001,345:9-16.

Muenzer J, Gucsavas-Calikoglu M, McCandless SE, Schuetz TJ, Kimura A: A phase I/II clinical trial of enzyme replacement therapy in mucopolysaccharidosis II (Hunter Syndrome). Mol Genet Metab 2007,90:329-37.

Muenzer J, Wraith JE, Beck M, Giugliani R, Harmatz P, Eng CM, et al.: A phase II/III clinical study of enzyme replacement therapy with idursulfase in mucopolysaccharidosis II (Hunter Syndrome). Genet Med 2006,8:465-73.

Banikazemi M, Bultas J, Waldek S, Wilcox WR, Whitley CB, McDonald M, et al.: Agalsidase-beta therapy for advanced Fabry Disease: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2007,146:77-86.

Bierer G, Balfe D, Wilcox WR, Mosenifar Z: Improvement in serial cardiopulmonary exercise testing following enzyme replacement therapy in Fabry Disease. J Inherit Metab Dis 2006,29:572-9.

Schiffmann R, Hauer P, Freeman B, Ries M, Scott LJC, Polydefkis M, et al.: Enzyme replacement therapy and intraepidermal innervation density in Fabry Disease. Muscle Nerve 2006,34:53-6.

Moore DF, Altarescu G, Herscovitch P, Schiffmann R: Enzyme replacement reverses abnormal cerebrovascular responses in Fabry Disease. BMC Neurology 2002,2.

Hajioff D, Goodwin S, Quiney R, Zuckerman J, MacDermot KD, Mehta A: Hearing improvement in patients with Fabry Disease treated with agalsidase alfa. Acta Paediatr Suppl 2003,92:28-30.

Hughes DA, Elliott PM, Shah J, Zuckerman J, Coghlan G, Brookes J, et al.: Effects of enzyme replacement therapy on the cardiomyopathy of Anderson-Fabry Disease: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of agalsidase alfa. Heart 2008,94:153-8.

National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence: Fingolimod for the treatment of highly active relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis [TA254] [Internet]. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2012 [cited 12.9.12].

CRD and CHE Technology Assessment Group: Fingolimod for the treatment of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis [Internet]. York: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination/Centre for Health Economics, 2011 [cited 12.9.12].

National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence: Tocilizumab for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (rapid review of technology appraisal guidance 198) [TA247] [Internet]. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2012 [cited 10.9.12].

Meads C, Jit M, Tsourapas A, Ashfaq K, Connock M, Fry-Smith A, et al.: Tocilizumab for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a single technology appraisal [Internet]. Birmingham: West Midlands, Health Technology Assessment Collaboration, 2009 [cited 5.9.12].

National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence: Liraglutide for the treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus [TA203] [Internet]. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2010 [cited 10.9.12].

Cummins E, Royle P, Shyangdan D, Waugh N: Liraglutide for the treatment of Type 2 Diabetes: a single technology appraisal [Internet]. Aberdeen Aberdeen HTA Group, 2009 [cited 5.9.12].

National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence: Golimumab for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis after the failure of previous disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs [TA225] [Internet]. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2011 [cited 10.9.12].

Jackson R, Tosh J, Davis S, Wong R, Stevenson M, Stevens J: Golimumab for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis after failure of previous disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: a single technology appraisal [Internet]. Sheffield: ScHARR, The University of Sheffield, 2010 [cited 10.9.12].

National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence: Cilostazol, naftidrofuryl oxalate, pentoxifylline and inositol nicotinate for the treatment of intermittent claudication in people with peripheral arterial disease [TA223] [Internet]. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2011 [cited 11.9.12].

Squires H, Simpson E, Meng Y, Harnan S, Stevens J, Wong R: Cilostazol, naftidrofuryl oxalate, pentoxifylline and inositol nicotinate for the treatment of intermittent claudication in people with peripheral arterial disease (Assessment Report) [Internet]. Sheffield: ScHARR, The University of Sheffield, 2010 [cited 11.9.12].

National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence: Adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, rituximab and abatacept for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis after the failure of a TNF inhibitor [TA195] [Internet]. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2008 [cited 12.9.12].

Malottki K, Barton P, Tsourapas A, Uthman A, Liu Z, Routh K, et al.: Adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, rituximab and abatacept for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis after the failure of a TNF inhibitor: a systematic review and economic evaluation (Assessment Report) [Internet]. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2009 [cited 12.9.12].

National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence: Donepezil, galantamine, rivastigmine and memantine for the treatment of Alzheimer’s Disease: review of NICE technology appraisal guidance 111 [TA217] [Internet]. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2011 [cited 16.10.12].

Bond M, Rogers G, Peters J, Anderson R, Hoyle M, Miners A, et al.: The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of donepezil, galantamine, rivastigmine and memantine for the treatment of Alzheimer's Disease (review of TA111): a systematic review and economic model [Internet]. Exeter: Peninsula Technology Assessment Group (PenTAG), University of Exeter, 2010 [cited 16.10.12].

Zinman B, Gerich J, Buse JB, Lewin A, Schwartz S, Raskin P, et al.: Efficacy and Safety of the Human Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Analog Liraglutide in Combination With Metformin and Thiazolidinedione in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes (LEAD-4 Met+TZD). Diabetes Care 2009,32:1224-1230.

Kay J, Matteson EL, Dasgupta B, Nash P, Durez P, Hall S, et al.: Golimumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite treatment with methotrexate: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study. Arthritis Rheum 2008,58:964-75.

Keystone EC, Genovese MC, Klareskog L, Hsia EC, Hall ST, Miranda PC, et al.: Golimumab, a human antibody to tumour necrosis factor {alpha} given by monthly subcutaneous injections, in active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate therapy: the GO-FORWARD Study. Ann Rheum Dis 2009,68:789-96.

Smolen JS, Kay J, Doyle MK, Landewé R, Matteson EL, Wollenhaupt J, et al.: Golimumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis after treatment with tumour necrosis factor ? inhibitors (GO-AFTER study): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial. The Lancet 2009,374:210-221.

Froud R, Eldridge S, Lall R, Underwood M: Estimating the number needed to treat from continuous outcomes in randomised controlled trials: methodological challenges and worked example using data from the UK Back Pain Exercise and Manipulation (BEAM) trial. BMC Med Res Methodol 2009,9:35.

On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables. American Psychological Association, 2002.

Posada de la Paz M, Groft SC, Carey J: The Importance of Case Reports in Advancing Scientific Knowledge of Rare Diseases. In: Rare Diseases Epidemiology.Edited by: Springer Netherlands; 2010: 77-86.

Griggs RC, Batshaw M, Dunkle M, Gopal-Srivastava R, Kaye E, Krischer J, et al.: Clinical research for rare disease: Opportunities, challenges, and solutions. Mol Genet Metab 2009,96:20-26.